The “rightness” or “wrongness” of homosexuality is not up for debate. The act itself is termed an “abomination” in God’s eyes – Fact. As to homosexual couplings as marriage? Please. More to the point is the far more intriguing aspect of knowing whether or not, a couple is homosexual or Lesbian when they are in the process of buying a product or service, and whether that lack of knowledge serves to hinder the merchant/provider deciding whether to provide the couple with the product/service or not. “Freedom of activity” shall we say…

In my post-WWII boyhood England, every neighborhood had its “queers.” Some were Irish, some were Welsh; some were Scots, some were Catholic, some were Protestant, others were Church of England. Some were “mutterers” and some were “spiritists;” some “diviners” and others “Luciferians.” There were always more than enough “queers” to go around. Even homosexuals. All the queers in the neighborhood stayed within their own boundaries, and it was only when one or more stepped over the boundary lines that trouble ensued. Which is why the cops (Constable On Patrol) walked the streets of Manchester/Liverpool and elsewhere in fours. The “Teddy Boys” had slicked-back hair with a “DA”, carried “knuckle-dusters” on their fists, and wore crepe-soled blue suede shoes ala “Elvis-the Pelvis.” Trouble was their middle name.

The quiet, gentle, “queers” on the other hand, never troubled anybody. They lived their lives in peace and tranquility, in harmonious relationship with every other member of the neighborhood. They didn’t push themselves on anybody, didn’t intrude into anybody else’s lives, and only rarely would they leave their boundary lines. All was quiet on the Western Front you could say. Then came the militant homosexuals to upset the whole harmonious hegemony. Homosexual couplings as marriage? Why would they do that to themselves …

Russell D. Moore unravels it all for us …