Thirteen years ago in July of 2001 I was a participant in a debate in Manchester U.K. on the long-term effects of the unbridled Islamic Jihadist Muslim infiltration of “England’s green and pleasant land.” By using the boiling frog metaphor in illustrating what I had witnessed in my first visit back to Britain in over eight years, I was immediately labeled “alarmist.” Two months later following my return to the United States, the first “9/11” and its horrific reality exploded (literally) onto the global scene and America for one, was changed forever. I had become (for want of a better description) a reverse terrorist.
Subsequent Islamic Jihadist Muslim atrocities in Spain and in Britain itself, only further exacerbated the smothering effect of the aforementioned infiltration of the soldiers of Allah and their insidious takeover of unwary countries. The northern Caliphate of Europe, once known as Great Britain, is now on the brink of complete and total surrender to the Muslim hordes and Shari’ah Law. So much for my reverse terrorist warning.
Robert Spencer, no stranger to Islamic Jihadist Muslim terrorists, uses his latest piece for FrontPage Magazine to highlight just how further down the Islamic Jihadist Muslim nightmare Britain has somnambulantly allowed itself to slowly slide into, some thirteen years following my “alarmist” moment. In a nutshell, the country that gave us George Orwell’s 1984 now gives us the real 1984, as the painful and depressing spectacle of the decline and fall of the once mighty Great Britain (the world’s greatest power at one point) now slowly self-destructs while cowering shamefully before degenerate Islamic Jihadist Muslim dictates; and yours truly, the reverse terrorist.
Britain’s own police arresting a private citizen for quoting a Sir Winston Churchill classic illustration of the evils of “Mohammedism” would be on a par with United States local police throwing someone in clink for using a General George Patton quote like “It seems to me a certainty that the fatalistic teachings of Mohammed and the utter degradation of the Arab women are the outstanding causes for the arrested development of the Arab. He is exactly as he was around the year 700, while we have been developing.” Not a hint of a reverse terrorist in that quote.
Dripping with sarcasm, Spencer trips not-so-lightly through the tulips of truth, to which yours truly will provide the appropriate introduction, as with: Yes, that Churchill fellow has no place in modern society. Moral clarity is an insidious thing, undermining the shifting rules of political correctness and shining the light of truth on Shari’ah. Sure, his leadership was responsible for Britain’s survival against the German fascist onslaught, but who wants survival and freedom when the alternative is living in daily fear of saying the wrong thing or being beheaded by some deranged ..oops! .. misunderstood Islamic Jihadist Muslim terrorist? What a dreadful man. And all that from your reverse terrorist.
Onward to Robert Spencer…
Paul Weston, the chairman of a new political party in the United Kingdom called Liberty GB, was making a speech Saturday outside the Winchester Guildhall in Hampshire when suddenly everything went wrong. Weston made the mistake of quoting a notorious Islamophobe, whereupon a woman in the audience, disgusted by this hate speech, contacted police, and Weston was duly arrested.
The Islamophobe in question was an obscure British politician of the distant past named Winston Churchill, who apparently had something to do with leading the British to victory over something called Nazi Germany in a conflict apparently known as “World War II.” However, the Nazis were vociferous critics of Zionism, and thus couldn’t have been all bad. Even before he interfered with this righteous anti-Zionist activism, Churchill was an obvious hatemonger. In 1899 he wrote a book about an even more obscure war known as The River War, in which he spewed this Islamophobic hate:
How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the faith: all know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith.