I was musing the other night while nodding off to sleep, about the futility of a Hillary Rob-’em-Clinton going on now for some 18 months into her losing the 2016 election (and not close by any stretch of the imagination, but by a wide, wide, margin) as to what might be her intent in prolonging the endless rantings and ravings of it all being everyone else’s fault but her own. One of my conclusions was that knowing her characterless nature, one of the the inevitable bottom lines was that she won’t go away with everyone still talking and writing about her – endless rantings and ravings or not.
Understand who and what we are witnessing here. A pathetic episode of history about a well-connected criminal who has morphed into a delusional, anti-social psychopath with suicidal tendencies. And that’s an observation minus the obvious problematic bodily functions that first surfaced on her stumbling into/onto her plane while departing Yemen on her way to Oman in January of 2011. If you ignore her she will go away and that is the only way she will go because the powers that be don’t have the guts or the brains to prosecute her. Yet.
Hillary was sure that her team had fixed the election for her but as we all witness her stumble through life now, pathetic as it is, one cannot help thinking that this is all just karma.
Thankfully, Daniel J. Flynn has the capacity to bail us all out of our misery by a wonderful piece in The American Spectator based upon the Charles Dickens novel, ‘Great Expectations’ and his wonderful descriptive of Miss Havisham:
“Hillary Clinton reliving her presidential election sounds like Miss Havisham talking about her wedding day. They both, one senses, harbored great expectations that became great resentments”.
He goes on…
The letdown of the loss, of an office and of a husband, unleashed psychological torment. The latter copes by donning her bridal gown; the former, by periodically playing pundit pontificating on why a benighted electorate rejected her. Both characters exude a Dickensian quality in that they come across as such, well, characters.
Around the time she tripped over her feet in India last weekend Mrs. Clinton tripped over her words.
She blamed her electoral loss on the “backward” parts of America. She described the unenlightened electorate thusly: “you didn’t like black people getting rights; you don’t like women, you know, getting jobs; you don’t want to, you know, see that Indian-American succeeding more than you are.” If only she threw in a “like” and some “ums” with those “you knows,” then maybe a few of the “backwards” types she speaks about would finally understand her.
She also attributed votes for her opponent by “married white women” to “a sort of ongoing pressure to vote the way that your husband, your boss, your son — whoever — believes you should.” Daddy’s Goldwater Girl knows of the false consciousness she speaks.
Clinton found some consolation in defeat. She informed the Indians, “I won in counties that produce two-thirds of the economic output in the United States,” a variant of which she repeated elsewhere in the speech. Ironically, in her boast of the beautiful people she won she cogently explained, albeit unwittingly, why she lost ugly.
Consciously, publicly, outwardly she appears incapable of accepting blame. Instead, she conjures up villains straight out of central casting — did a single person vote for Trump because he or she resented the fact that an Indian-American enjoyed more success? — that make her look like a heroic martyr. Just as she failed to grasp why referring to a massive swath of her fellow countrymen as “deplorables” made for bad politics during the campaign, she does not see why bashing half the country as racists or Stepford wives or backwards hayseeds after the election reaffirms their decision to not vote for her.
To read to conclusion click here…
Hillary Clinton Havisham displays most of the symptoms of being a sociopath. She lies without conscience, has no empathy for others, has an incapacity to love, has shallow emotions, and exhibits a grandiose sense of self. In other words, she is a CON (WO)MAN, who has fooled the naïve amongst us for thirty years.
Consider: There are several things that MUST be kept in mind when thinking about Hillary Rob-’em-Clinton in her role as Miss Havisham …
1) She’s been breaking the law, lying to investigators and getting away with it ever since the 1979 ‘Cattle Futures’ Mafia Money Laundering Scheme. That debacle led directly to the ‘Whitewater’ Land/Cash Scam of the 1980s, for which she was still being investigated in 1993 as her husband, Bill Der Schlick-Meister was being sworn in as President of the United States.
2) ‘Hillary Havisham’ has always behaved as though rules, laws and morality simply didn’t apply to her. There are a number of psychological terms for people who behave that way; none of which are good.
3) As Obama’s Secretary Of State, ‘Ms. Havisham’ looked the family members of ‘The Benghazi Dead’ in the eyes, face to face, and full-bore lied to them about their loved one’s deaths being caused by a YouTube Video.
4) In her perfect role as Miss Havisham, Hillary Clinton is a soulless monster who will say anything to save her own skin. Instead of a Federal Prison, most Americans believe a proverbial Silver Stake needs to be driven through her heart. If not that then the rest of her miserable life spent in the confines of GITMO.
President Trump definitely has his hands full. America has forever been full of the ‘enemies within’ (as is evident from the Clintons and their ilk) and the current generation is seemingly no different. But as I constantly trumpet (pun intended) our nationalism, populism, and a new courageous president is all that stands in the way of these continuing threats from the liberal Leftist DemoMarxists. Of which the Clintons and their ilk are paramount.
A real threat that we ignore at our peril.
As for Hillary in her guise as Miss Havisham … Thank God for President Donald J. Trump for being so insightful, intuitive, and proactive – MAGA!
*************************
See also Jeffrey Folks: Hillary Clinton and Sclerotic Radicalism