In an outrageous statement Sunday night at yet another Islamic Jihadist Muslim Terrorist gathering polluting We The People’s mansion, the rogue faux “president” declared: Muslims built the very fabric of our nation .. ranting further through a released statement thanking Muslim Americans for their many “achievements and contributions to building the very fabric of our nation and strengthening the core of our democracy” (and there they go again with calling us a “democracy” when in fact we are a Constitutional Republic.)
The lying comments were made to mark the celebration of Eid-al-Fitr, a time of so-called “spiritual renewal for Muslims” which comes at the end of the month-long fast of Ramadan. The Obamas said in their statement that Eid “celebrates the common values that unite us in our humanity” and “welcomed their commitment to giving back to their communities.” The International Business Times reports that during Eid, Muslims join in Islamic prayer, while saying “Allahu Akbar,” or “God is Great,” and feasting. In reality what they are saying through “Allahu Akbar” is “Our god is greater.” Greater than whom – the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob?
The statement further reads that the administration “wishes Muslims in the United States and around the world a blessed and joyous celebration.” The letter ended with salutation of “Eid Mubarak,” which roughly means “blessed celebration.”
At the time I am posting this, the thread of comments on the end of the Breitbart White House piece exceeds more than 3400 responses, all in the general vicinity of “Allah was/is the name of one of the 365 gods of Mecca, the regional moon god, and was only one of a pantheon of local gods worshiped in the region where the insane Muhammad developed his “religion.” Very simply, Muhammad elected Allah to the position of “chief god” and, in a nod to disparaging the God of the Jews, he elevated Allah the moon god to the “only god.” In other words, Muhammad borrowed freely from the Judeo-Christian one true living God to embellish his own revision of his local deity. Something got lost in the translation however, since the true God is not mocked, and Islamic Muslim Jihadist Terrorism now embodies the totality of the moon god of Mecca. Hence the moon and star emblem on the banner of Islam.”
Islam is Satan’s religion, the counterfeit to Judeo-Christianity, and he is their god. This poisonous religion was birthed thousands of years ago when Lucifer rebelled against God, was tossed out of paradise, renamed Satan, and a third of heaven followed him; which continues to this day. Having studied the Qur’an for years, it is one long, vicious and bombastic rant against mankind; the Qur’an is certainly the book of Satan and one that he had written through the muddled mind of Muhammad. It is a tragedy that generation upon generation of children have to be indoctrinated in this manifest rubbish, and no wonder the Islamic Muslim authorities are so anxious to keep Bibles out of the hands of their people. The contrast between the two books is obvious to anyone with even half a brain, even to the feckless rogue president of Allahu-Akbar… As a for instance, might we consider just the following??
As a counter to all the despicable nonsense being perpetrated by this rogue administration, I reverted back to my archives and brought forth this very detailed examination of the truth of Islam, in a piece from 2005 in FrontPageMagazine authored by Dr. David Gutmann, professor emeritus of psychology at Northwestern Medical School and a veteran of the Israeli War of Independence in 1948. If anybody is/was an expert on the falsity of Islam, Muhammad, Al Taqiyya, and the global intent of Shari’ah Law, it is the late Dr. Gutmann who died at the age of 88 this past November 3rd. If nothing else, his “Saving Arabs From Themselves” is a clarion call to we patriots of freedom from tyranny as we face the feckless rogue president of Allahu-Akbar …
Saving Arabs From Themselves By: David Gutmann
FrontPageMagazine.com | Friday, August 12, 2005
A heated debate rages over the instigators of murderous jihad. Hawks often portray Islam as essentially violent—a creed for Holy Warriors—while doves usually make a distinction between the Koranic text and the murderous practices of its extreme adherents. Doves argue that Islam is one of the Great Religions, a “religion of Peace,” whose Koran has been hijacked to serve the purpose of jihad.
Maybe it is. But in 1948, my Hagana officers told us grunts to kill ourselves rather than face capture by jihadists: “Always keep a bullet or a grenade for yourself” was their considered advice. I doubt that they would have given the same warning were we facing Unitarians or Anglicans.
Nevertheless, I do not agree with many hawks that Islam by itself is the prime mover of Arab violence. When I consider the obsessions, the language and the actions of the extremists, it becomes evident that, perhaps even more than religion, overlooked aspects of national character contribute to the fevers of jihad. As a Jew who owns a Koran (Oh Imams, is this permitted?) it appears to me that the more lurid stanzas of that generally inflammatory text are being used, by Islamic extremists, to rationalize their fury over perceived insults that have nothing to do with Islam per se.
That fury is not a product of the Koran. Rather, it has to do with a prior, psychological cause: the vulnerabilities of Arab national character, which is centered on the maintenance of honor and the avoidance of shame. Some readers will probably accuse me of psychobabbling. Note, however, that some very smart observers—the Israeli anthropologist Rafael Patai, for instance—have already documented the Arab phobia against the experience of shame.
That sensitivity is now at fever pitch. The Arab world is suffering a crisis of humiliation. Their armies are routed not only by Americans, but also by tiny, Jewish Israel; and as Arthur Koestler once remarked, the Arab world has not, in the last 500 years or so, produced much besides rugs, dirty postcards, elaborations on the belly-dance esthetic (and, of course, some innovative terrorist practices). They have no science to speak of, no art, hardly any industry save oil, very little literature, and portentous music which consists largely of lugubrious songs celebrating the slaughter of Jews.
Now that the Arabs have acquired national consciousness, and they compare their societies to other nations, these deficiencies become painfully evident, particularly to the upper-class Arab kids who attend foreign universities. There they learn about the accomplishments of Christians, Jews, (Freud, Einstein, for starters) and women. And yet, with the exception of Edward Said, there is scarcely a contemporary Arab name in the bunch. No wonder, then, that major recruitment to al-Qaeda’s ranks takes place among Arab university students. And no wonder that suicide bombing becomes their tactic of choice: it is a last-ditch, desperate way of asserting at least one scrap of superiority—a spiritual superiority—over the materialistic, life-hugging, and ergo shameful West.
But this tactic is not, I suggest, a product of Islam. Rather, it is a product of the bruised Arab psyche. Remember that the Japanese also turned to suicide tactics in WWII to evade the humiliation of defeat. Though their religion was Shinto rather than Muslim, they too constituted a paradigm shame/honor culture, and defeat brought about, as with the Arabs, a furiously suicidal/homicidal response. After their armies had been defeated, their fleets sunk, their cities set aflame, and their home islands invaded, they launched the kamikaze bomber offensive, thereby committing a hi-tech form of hara-kiri, their usual remedy against intolerable shame. It is in this way that the modern Arab world resembles the Japan of World War II. In both cases it is not religions but psychic wounds, the wounds inflicted by defeat and evident inferiority, that inspire suicide bombers.
It is often asserted that the changes set in train by modernization are particularly toxic to the Arabs. No doubt this is true. But if we are going to be therapeutic, our diagnoses need to be more specific; we need to identify the particular pathogens that are released by modernization. Besides sharpening their sense of inferiority relative to the West, modernization threatens to bring about the liberation of women (as in Afghanistan and Iraq). I say “threatens,” because the self-esteem of Arab males is in large part predicated on the inferior position of their women. The Arab nations have for the most part lost their slaves and dhimmis, the subject peoples onto whose persons the stigmata of shame could be downloaded. But anyone who has spent time among them knows that Arab males have not lost their psychological need for social and sexual inferiors. In the absence of slaves and captive peoples, Arab women are elected for the special role of the inferior who, by definition, lacks honor. Arab men eradicate shame and bolster their shaky self-esteem by imposing the shameful qualities of the dhimmi, submission and passivity, upon women. Trailing a humbled woman behind them, Arab men can walk the walk of the true macho man.
Hence the relative lack of material achievement by Arabs: the Arab world has stunted the female half of its brain pool, while the men acquire instant self-esteem not by real accomplishment, but by the mere fact of being men, rather than women. No wonder, then, that the Arab nations feel irrationally threatened by the very existence of Israel. Like America, the Jews have brought the reality of the liberated woman into the very heart of the Middle East, into dar al-Islam itself. Big Satan and Little Satan: the champions of Muslim women.
I contend that female liberation is the most hopeful development in the Middle East, greater even than the first stirrings of democracy. I believe that Arab women have a greater stake in liberal democracy than Arab men, and as they acquire political power, they will fight for it. As for suicide bombings, jihadism and the macho posturing of Arab men, they are desperate remedies against further humiliation, against the perceived threat of “castration,” by their own women. Until Arab women achieve freedom and independence, we can expect, at least for awhile, to see Arab men cling to these remedies.
Even then, some Arab men will probably backslide to even greater suicidal/homicidal tantrums. Others, (perhaps even a majority) no longer able to project their deficiencies onto Arab women, will begin to recognize the flaws in themselves. These converts would adopt the self-critical stance that is already showing up among some daring Arab intellectuals and even religious leaders. And when Arab men can no longer acquire instant self-esteem by demeaning their women, some of them might even turn to the arts of peace, and try to acquire the sense of self-worth via instrumental rather than illusory psychological means.
We cannot, in the end, correct all the distortions of the Arab shame/honor ethos. But by pledging our support for Arab women’s liberation—for instance, by advocating expanded liberties for women in the text of the new Iraqi constitution—we can hasten its erosion.
So much then, for the feckless rogue president of Allahu-Akbar declaring “Muslims built the very fabric of our nation” while thanking them for their many “achievements and contributions to building the very fabric of our nation and strengthening the core of our democracy.”
The feckless rogue president of Allahu-Akbar couldn’t be further from the truth if he lied – Oh wait!
sourced from Breitbart/FrontPageMagazine/Archives/Drudge/Personal Files…