En Garde in the bunker…

Cancelling “The F-term Culture” is exactly what needs to happen. Now!

The F-term, now more than ever, increasingly seeps into every aspect of life. The all-encompassing, all-descriptive, all-scientific, all-condoning, all-passionate, all-whatever F-term strikes again, as usual, when in doubt, when in lack of any reasoning, or substance. It is lame and predictable how the popular culture quickly defends the sweeping use of the F-term for all of their topics and emotions they can’t describe with words or reasoning.

Consider Psalm 5:9 KJV: For there is no faithfulness in their mouth; their inward part is very wickedness; their throat is an open sepulchre; they flatter with their tongue.
Romans 3:13: Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips:

Mmmmm … Just because a near-majority of voters believe something, doesn’t mean that “something” actually happened. And government of the people, by the people and for the people means (one would hope) government under the rule of law. Not mob rule.

Absent of evidence court rule by fiat

Since 2016, long before the “Trump cult” bleated about fraud, claiming conspiracy, etc., Marxists/demoMarxocrats have been crying like babies about how voter ID laws suppress minority voters; that cleaning up voting rolls is designed to suppress minority voters; that Republican gerrymandering suppresses minority voters (but notice never demoMarxocrat gerrymandering!) … you get the picture.

Thus, the whole point of tossing the cases before they were ever heard was to choke off any potential for legitimate claims of voter fraud. As commenters know from experience with the trolls, the VERY first thing trolls always claim is that “there was no evidence” that fraud took place, even though there is MOUNTAINS of evidence. But, unfortunately, it was never allowed to be considered in a court of law. And by the ever-malleable standards of the left, if it wasn’t considered by a court, then it isn’t legitimate.

Then there are the false “BlueAnon” conspiracy theories that have been regurgitated falsely for the past 20 years or so. It’s always been a lie, yet still it keeps getting spread like BS Marxist agitprop. Just like the Trump/Russia “collusion” hoax begun by “Hillary Rob’em”, which was then usurped by the OBO#44KenyanKommie and his regime to illegally affect the outcome of 2016 in favor of “Rob’em”, and then to initiate a 50-month non-violent insurrection against President Trump; a coup by the way, that was successfully completed on 1/20/2021 when LG Brandon became a squatter at the White House aka the village idiot “coupman!”

Jay Whig, American Greatness: ‘The Mysterious Case of the Absence of Evidence’ …

When a court declares by fiat that half of the electorate is imagining things, it undermines the very idea of government of the people, by the people and for the people.

We live in what might be called a political opinion “bubble.” One of the features of this bubble is the authority of science. This is the idea that the magic words “the science is settled” foreclose further discussion of an opinion. It is often expressed as I f—ing love science, or IFLS.

The reason IFLS exists is to enforce political dogmas with the authority of empirical material science. The flip side of IFLS is the conflation of the absence of evidence with proof or conclusive evidence. Let’s call this I f—ing love evidence, or IFLE. The purpose of IFLE is to discredit facts that might be used to resist a policy or political act.

A few days ago, USA Today ran an IFLE story under the headline “Fact check: No evidence defunding police to blame for homicide increases, experts say.”

The “experts say” part of the headline is a sly admission that IFLE really means I am feeling stupid, or IAFS. When someone points out that politicians degraded the anti-homicide infrastructure and an increase in homicide followed, that is evidence of causation. It may not be conclusive evidence. It may be only circumstantial evidence. Maybe it is just a correlation. [-]

[+] … Courts are in the evidence business. The “facts” are supported by evidence and decisions are made based on “burdens of persuasion” such as “preponderance of evidence” (more than half), “clear and convincing evidence” (strong evidence) and evidence that is “beyond a reasonable doubt” (no reasonable person could doubt it). In criminal cases there may be instances where there is a lot of evidence, even clear and convincing evidence, that the defendant murdered the victim, but no conviction because a reasonable person could doubt it. [-]

[+] … Admittedly, the grandiose behavior of certain persons connected to the president did undermine the credibility of such claims. But “lack of any evidence” is an unserious assertion. Defenders of representative republicanism would be better off admitting there is evidence, but they do not find it sufficient, and in any event, in the interests of certainty, the matter was put behind us by the many courts that were petitioned and declined to hear the claims, and on January 6, 2020 when the ballots of the electors were counted.

The view that it is somehow unpatriotic to question the fairness of elections is itself unpatriotic. America has a Voting Rights Act because people doggedly questioned the fairness of elections in America until Congress finally acted to address the misconduct….

Full link below…

Absent of evidence court rule by fiat. Justice to be served?

The courts have taken what might be described as “an eastern philosophical position; if a tree falls in the forest with no ears to hear, does it make a sound? It matters not for the tree that has fallen.”

Which also means the courts don’t want to hear evidence lest they conclude that the current dementia-riven fraud wasn’t elected, but was installed by illegal means, and like the fallen tree that doesn’t exist until the sound is heard, neither does the stolen election until the evidence is heard.

The judges, crooks that they are–all of them–that dismissed the 2020 election fraud cases for lack of evidence or lack of standing or other legal sophistry, knew that if they allowed the cases to be heard, they risked the potential of “clear and convincing” evidence being presented. Not so much a ruling for or against the plaintiffs, but that the evidence would become public record, accorded some legitimacy (regardless of the ruling) and would provide the basis for continued claims of voter fraud. As Mr. Whig noted in the article, even if the judge ruled against the plaintiffs, that wouldn’t mean there was no evidence, only that the court wasn’t convinced. For definition of “court”, simply read “Judge”.

Just remember: Absent of evidence court rule by fiat.

Consider Psalm 5:9 KJV: For there is no faithfulness in their mouth; their inward part is very wickedness; their throat is an open sepulchre; they flatter with their tongue.
Romans 3:13: Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips:

And on that note, time for today’s MAGA Pill – Still our warrior-president Donald John Trump working tirelessly to MAGA! KAG!

*************************

• Jay Whig, American Greatness: The Mysterious Case of the Absence of Evidence