As I and many others have commented on before, you have to be ignorant, stupid or both, to fail to see the reality of Islam, which was born in blood, bathed in blood, and feeds off blood. It grew from nothing into a worldwide plague by forcing people to convert at the point of a sword, and continues to exist by putting the threat of violent death at the throat of every person born a Muslim. Plus, you can’t leave Islam or embrace another faith without getting a death sentence on your head. Islam cannot be at peace with either itself, or any other religion. Its own tenets make that impossible.
The current ill-conceived idea of Western identity politics is that groups of people have the same experiences and the same interests, and should act accordingly. This applies to all groups except Muslims. When their common background, common beliefs, and common interests are mentioned, the post modern left (ie ‘pomo’ for short) says it’s all ‘stereotypes’.
While stereotyping is bad, diversity is good. Islam is the ‘religion of peace’. No terror, no wars, no oppression, no history of slavery ever having anything to do with Islam, which offers ‘diversity’, and diversity is our strength (sarc). Even the Pope agrees with the ‘social justice warrior’ position (as in sjw for short – more sarc). The pomo left is in denial and idealizes Islam. It’s just belief in a god, that’s all, so Muslims should be allowed to exercise their ‘freedom of religion’ in the West, just like they do, uh… in the Middle East, say.
And when Allahu Ali Akbar shoots up Munich, or Paris, or Orlando, or Fort Hood, or Sydney, or wherever else, what’s the explanation? Well, he was probably a deluded neo-Nazi, inspired by an even more deluded Norwegian white Christian middle-aged male, who was an anti-feminist racist, or worse. As we all know, groups of people have the same interests, and the pomo left has the class of terrorists conveniently cornered under the ‘right-wing’ label. And, because the right-wing is ‘anti-Muslimist’ according to intersectional theory’s oppression tables, the left has to fight for the Islamic cause.
Looking at Europe, the leftists see a terrible enemy on its own soil. It’s the right-wing extremism that is advancing in France and Germany and Holland and Norway. And lookit!, they have now even caused Brexit! It’s time to crack down on the reactionary middle-aged white Christian male class of oppressors with their racist hatred for Muslims. And yes, the easiest way is to bring in more of those peaceful Islamic jihadists. That’ll show ’em. The Media and establishment know full well what they’re doing. When they snuff the facts for example, and force the press to report a fantasy, you can rest assured they know what is really going on. They really do know what they are doing.
The take-down of Western Civilization is a controlled demolition, and most members of our government are willing participants. Islam isn’t, per se, just a ‘religion’. It is more accurate to describe it as a system of conquest and a form of totalitarian government disguised (or bearded) as a religion, and some would argue that’s why it should be contained in the 57 countries that expressly favor this ideology.
And yours truly for one, is all for that. Go for it!
Now to Selwyn Duke and his piece today from American Thinker, “The Establishment and the Nature of Islam”…
The media and effete powers-that-be have been twisting themselves into Halal pretzels Islamsplainin’, rationalizing how a given Muslim terrorist attack isn’t really “Islamic” or isn’t significant. These contortions can become quite ridiculous, such as suggesting that recent Allahu Akbar-shouting Munich shooter Ali Sonboly might somehow have had “right-wing” motives because, among his violent passions, was an interest in Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik.
A more common (un)intellectual contortion is the minimizing tactic of claiming, as is politically correct authorities’ wont, that a given jihadist attacker “has no ties to IS” (the Islamic State), as if there’s nothing to see here if a man doesn’t provide notarized evidence of allegiance to the boogeyman du jour. Yet this is much as if we’d claimed during the Cold War that a Marxist terrorist attack wasn’t really a Marxist™ terrorist attack because we couldn’t find a connection to the Soviet Union. The issue and problem wasn’t primarily the Soviet Union but communism (Marxism birthed the USSR, not the other way around), an evil ideology that wreaks havoc wherever it takes hold. Likewise, the IS didn’t birth Islam; Islam birthed the IS.
Nonetheless, moderns will often use the misdirection of focusing inordinately on national or group associations when discussing terrorism. This is a dodge, one designed to help us avoid uncomfortable truths, and which relegates us to playing an eternal game of whack-a-mole. The USSR is gone but communism is still a problem (witness North Korea and Cuba), and insofar as it’s less of a threat, it’s largely because its ideas have been discredited. Bad ideas’ standard bearers will change. But as long as the bad ideas remain tolerated and credible, they’ll always win converts.
In fact, the reality that today’s terrorists are diverse makes the point. They may be Iranian, Afghani, American, Albanian, German or from any nation whatsoever; they may be part of Hamas, IS, al Qaeda, the U.S. Army (Maj. Hassan), some other organization or no organization; they may be of any race or ethnicity, be rich or poor, and male or (occasionally) female. They only have one truly common thread: being Muslim.
Continues in American Thinker…