En Garde In The Bunker
A codicil on the Khizr Khan conundrum exposing him yet again as using al taqiyya to dupe the American people. A red flag went up when Khan, a lawyer and follower of Islam, started waving the constitution around. Any freedom-loving American citizen knows that the Constitution and Shari’ah Law are as far apart as oil is to water, as up to down, as in and out, and as far as the east is from the west (which is ad infinitum). The two are totally incompatible both in content and purpose, so the motive on this stunt cooked up by the ever-present White House Muslim Brotherhood was purely political. Khan’s connection to an immigration law group was quietly removed once this became widely known. The ruse is up.
Just keep reminding yourselves folks that both of the DemoMarxist nominees have bowed to Islam and taken huge amounts of money from them. Do you really think that CAIR would be giving money to the likes of Tim Kaine and expect nothing in return? Or do you think that countries like Qatar, UAE and others would be giving millions to Hillary and Bill Clinton if they didn’t expect to exert some influence over them? Just think on it for a minute. This current administration is riddled with Islamic Jihadist Muslim moles from top to bottom and side to side, beginning with Obama, to Jarrett, to Abedin, to the two Congressional Muslims and right on down through the food chain. We The people are being hornswoggled right under our very noses.
The other conundrum is the RINO Party. You would think the Republican Party would have a strong organization to assist the official nominee, but the problem we have here is “a failure to communicate” (H/T the movie “Cool Hand Luke”) when it is patently clear that the GOP is actively assisting Hillary Clinton, being pushed along along by the likes of Paul Ryan, quisling Neville Chamberlain that he is. No man or woman is perfect. No man or woman can do something of this magnitude on his/her own. Trump has no help. He has no political allies. Both parties and most of the media want him to lose, and they would all rather see this country fall under the weight of the decades of political scandals perpetrated by the corrupt Clintons than have Trump as president, and damn the consequences for you and your family. That, unfortunately, is the reality.
The fact that Khan is running for the tall grass to hide does not mean they won. Trump may have had a few days of negative press. But they don’t call it “drive-by media” for nothing. They are moving on to other things. What Trump did is put any future DNC props on notice. You want to attack, then you’d better be legit. What is refreshing about Trump is his willingness to accept short-term political or PR loss for long-term gain. It’s unheard of in politics and why the consultants, professional politicians, and pundits can’t wrap their minds around Trump’s strategy.
One last point then on to Jack Cashill and his piece “Khizr Khan’s Subordinating US Constitution to Shari’ah Law” in today’s American Thinker. Khizr Khan is just the latest representation of the Manchurian Candidate Islamic Jihadist Muslim mole infiltrated into the United States to accomplish the takedown of the west, aided and abetted by the high-stakes leaders and acolytes of all three branches of government. Islam is antithetical to the U.S. Constitution and to Human Rights. There is no separation between mosque and state. The mosque IS the state.
And it stinks to high heaven.
He was presented to the nation as a Constitution-loving (he carries a pocket copy, doncha know!) immigrant who just happens to be from Pakistan, but it turns out that Khizr Khan is a recognized scholar on Sharia law. And in his published writings, he seems to approve of subordinating the Constitution to Allah’s own Sharia. Paul Sperry reports at Breitbart:
Khizr M. Khan has published papers supporting the supremacy of Islamic law over “man-made” Western law — including the very Constitution he championed in his Democratic National Convention speech attacking GOP presidential nod Donald Trump.
In 1983, for example, Khan wrote a glowing review of a book compiled from a seminar held in Kuwait called “Human Rights In Islam” in which he singles out for praise the keynote address of fellow Pakistani Allah K. Brohi, a pro-jihad Islamic jurist who was one of the closest advisers to late Pakistani dictator Gen. Zia ul-Haq, the father of the Taliban movement.
Khan speaks admiringly of Brohi’s interpretation of human rights, even though it included the right to kill and mutilate those who violate Islamic laws and even the right of men to “beat” wives who act “unseemly.”
Brohi has quite a few “accomplishments” for Khan to admire:
[Brohi] restored Sharia punishments, such as amputations for theft and demands that rape victims produce four male witnesses or face adultery charges. He also made insulting the Muslim prophet Muhammad a crime punishable by death. To speed the Islamization of Pakistan, he and Zia issued a law that required judges to consult mullahs on every judicial decision for Sharia compliance.
Continue to end in American Thinker…
